RAWSEP Resident...'s profileResidential Wood Burning...BlogListsNetwork Tools Help

Blog


    June 12

    Until 2009 July 13 Submit Public Comments on PM10 from Wood Burning Devices (in California) to the EPA

    this is for PM10 regulations, not the more significant PM2.5.  But they are targeting wood smoke.  So, our comments should focus on EPA regulating the more hazardous PM2.5, not just the PM10.  Maybe that’s why the statement “we don’t expect opposition/controversy” was added to the notice.

    Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District and South Coast Air Quality Management District
    PDF Version (2 pp, 81K, About PDF)
    
    [Federal Register: June 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 111)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Page 27738-27739]
    From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
    [DOCID:fr11jn09-29]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 52
    [EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0142, FRL-8901-9]
    
    Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air
    Quality Management District and South Coast Air Quality Management District
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Antelope Valley
    Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) and South Coast Air Quality
    Management District portions of the California State Implementation
    Plan (SIP). Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
    (CAA or the Act), we are proposing to approve local rules that address
    particulate matter (PM-10) emissions from open outdoor fires and from
    wood burning devices.
    
    DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 13, 2009.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-
    
    [[Page 27739]]
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-

    [[Page 27739]]

    OAR-2009-0142, by one of the following methods:
        • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Follow the on-line instructions.
        • E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
        • Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
    Francisco, CA 94105.
        Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
    without change and may be made available online at http://
    www.regulations.gov
    , including any personal information provided,
    unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
    other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
    clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://
    www.regulations.gov
    or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an
    ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
    contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
    If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
    automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
    EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
    contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
        Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
    electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
    Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
    documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
    be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
    material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
    (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
    appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, Permits Office (AIR-4),
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 947-4118,
    petersen.alfred@epa.gov.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the approval of
    AVAQMD Rule 444 and SCAQMD Rule 445. In the Rules and Regulations
    section of this Federal Register, we are approving these local rules in
    a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe this
    SIP revision is not controversial. If we receive adverse comments,
    however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
    and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule.
        Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
    paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
    from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
    of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
        We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
    interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
    receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
    information, please see the direct final action.

        Dated: April 14, 2009.
    Laura Yoshii,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    [FR Doc. E9-13482 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P on August 10, 2009 without further
    notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by July 13, 2009. If we
    receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
    Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
    not take effect.

    ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
    2009-0142, by one of the following methods:
         Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Follow the online instructions.
         E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
         Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
    Francisco, CA 94105.

    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
    without change and may be made available online at http://
    www.regulations.gov
    , including any personal information provided,
    unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
    other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
    clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://
    www.regulations.gov
    or e-mail. Http://www.regulations.gov is an
    ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
    contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
    If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
    automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
    EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
    contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
    comment.
        Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
    electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
    Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
    documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
    be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
    material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
    (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
    appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfred Petersen, EPA Region IX, (415)
    947-4118, petersen.alfred@epa.gov.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ''we,'' ``us'' and
    ``our'' refer to EPA.

    Table of Contents

    I. The State's Submittal
        A. What rules did the State submit?
        B. Are there other versions of these rules?
        C. What are the purposes of the submitted new rule and rule
    revisions?
    II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
        A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
        B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
        C. EPA recommendation to further improve a rule
        D. Public comment and final action
    III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    I. The State's Submittal

    A. What rules did the State submit?

        Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that the
    rules were amended by the local air agencies and submitted by the
    California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                                Table 1--Submitted Rules
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Local agency               Rule No.         Rule title            Amended or adopted     Submitted
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    AVAQMD...............................        444  Open Outdoor Fires......  02/19/08 Amended.......     07/18/08
    SCAQMD...............................        445  Wood Burning Devices....  03/07/08 Adopted.......     07/18/08
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [[Page 27717]]

        On August 22, 2008, the submittal of AVAQMD Rule 444 and SCAQMD
    Rule 445 were determined to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR
    part 51, appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

    B. Are there other versions of these rules?

        A version of AVAQMD Rule 444 was approved into the SIP on July 6,
    1982 (47 FR 29231).
        There is no version of SCAQMD Rule 445 in the SIP.

    C. What are the purposes of the submitted new rule and rule revisions?

        Section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires States to submit
    regulations that control volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides,
    particulate matter, and other air pollutants which harm human health
    and the environment. These rules were developed as part of local air
    districts' programs to control these pollutants.
        The purposes of the submitted AVAQMD Rule 444 revisions relative to
    the SIP rule are as follows:
         444(A): The rule is revised to apply the District Smoke
    Management Program to open burning while minimizing smoke impacts to
    the public.
         444(B)(13): An ``Approved Burn Plan'' is replaced with a
    ``Smoke Management Plan.''
         444(C)(1): The requirement is added for all burn projects
    that are greater than 10 acres or that are estimated to produce more
    than one ton of particulate matter shall be conducted in accordance
    with the Smoke Management Program.
         444(C)(2): A list added of materials prohibited from open
    burning.
         444(C)(3): The permission is added to burn during adverse
    meteorological conditions in a case where there would be an imminent
    and substantial economic loss, providing a special permit is obtained
    from the District and not from a local fire agency.
         444(C)(4): The provision is added for a prescribed burn
    permittee to obtain from CARB up to 48 hours in advance of the burn day
    a permissive-burn, marginal-burn, or no-burn forecast.
         444(C)(6): The requirements are added for ignition,
    stacking, drying, and time of day for open burning with the exception
    of prescribed burning.
         444(C)(7): The list is added for burning applications that
    require a permit, such as (a) empty containers used for explosives, (b)
    right-of-way clearance for a public entity or utility, or (c) wood
    waste.
         444(C)(9): The requirement is added for a Smoke Management
    Plan for prescribed burning in (a) forest management, (b) range
    improvement, and (c) wildland vegetation management.
         444(D)(1): Exemptions are deleted for (a) open fires in
    agricultural operations at over 3,000 feet elevation and (b) open fires
    in agricultural burning at over 6,000 feet elevation.
        The primary purpose of SCAQMD Rule 445 is to reduce the emission of
    particulate matter from wood burning devices. The rule contains the
    following requirements:
         445(d)(1): No person shall install a woodburning device in
    a new development unless it is (A) an EPA Phase II-certified
    woodburning heater, (B) a pellet-fueled heater, (C) a masonry heater,
    (D) a woodburning device that meets emission standards in 40 CFR part
    60, subpart AAA, or (E) a dedicated gaseous-fueled fireplace.
         445(d)(3): No person shall burn fuel not intended for a
    woodburning device.
         445(d)(4): A commercial firewood facility shall sell
    seasoned wood only from July 1 through the end of February but may sell
    both seasoned and unseasoned wood the balance of the year.
         445(e): No person shall burn wood indoors or outdoors when
    a mandatory woodburning curtailment day is forecast.
         445(f): Devices exempt from requirements of the rule are
    (1) cookstoves, (2) devices with no gas infrastructure near new
    developments, (3) permanently-installed devices upon property sale, (4)
    properties registered as a historic site, and (5) manufactured
    firelogs.
         445(f)(6): Circumstances exempt from requirements of the
    rule are (A) sole source of heat, (B) low income household, (C) no gas
    infrastructure available, (D) elevation over 3,000 ft, and (E)
    ceremonial fires.
        EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about
    these rules.

    II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

        Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
    CAA) and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and
    193). SIP rules in serious PM-10 nonattainment areas must require for
    significant sources best available control measures (BACM), including
    best available control technology (BACT) (see section 189(b)). AVAQMD
    and SCAQMD regulate serious PM-10 nonattainment areas (see 40 CFR part
    81), so AVAQMD Rule 444 and SCAQMD Rule 445 must fulfill the
    requirements of BACM/BACT.
        Guidance and policy documents that we used to help evaluate rules
    consistently include the following:
         Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
    Implementation Plans, U.S. EPA, 40 CFR part 51.
         PM-10 Guideline Document (EPA-452/R-93-008).
         Technical Information Document for Residential Wood
    Combustion Best Available Control Measures, (EPA-450/2-92-002).
         Minimum BACM/RACM Control Measures for Residential Wood
    Combustion Rules, EPA Region IX (September 16, 2008).

    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

        We believe that AVAQMD Rule 444 and SCAQMD Rule 445 are consistent
    with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability, BACM/
    BACT, and SIP relaxations and should be given full approval. The TSD
    has more information on our evaluation.

    C. EPA recommendation to further improve a rule

        The TSD describes an additional rule revision that does not affect
    EPA's current action but is recommended for the next time the local
    agency modifies SCAQMD Rule 445.

    D. Public comment and final action

        As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the CAA, EPA is fully
    approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
    relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
    approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
    However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
    simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule. If we
    receive adverse comments by July 13, 2009, we will publish a timely
    withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
    final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
    a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
    timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
    without further notice on August 10, 2009. This will incorporate the
    rule into the Federally enforceable SIP.
        Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
    paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
    from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
    of the rule that

    [[Page 27718]]

    are not the subject of an adverse comment.

    III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
    action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
    subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
    reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
    ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
    Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
    merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
    no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
    Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
    under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
    this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
    not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
    State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
    uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
    Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
        This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
    not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
    the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
    on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
    Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
    FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
    implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
    States, on the relationship between the national government and the
    States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
    various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
    FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a State rule
    implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
    the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
    Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
    ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
    Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a State rule
    implementing a Federal standard.
        In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
    choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
    this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
    State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
    to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
    inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
    submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
    satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
    of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
    Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
    impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
    to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
    take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
    Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
    804(2).
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
    judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
    of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 10, 2009. Filing a
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
    review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
    rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
    to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
    reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
    and recordkeeping requirements.

        Dated: April 3, 2009.
    Laura Yoshii,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    0
    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
    amended as follows:

    PART 52--[AMENDED]

    0
    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

        Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Subpart F--California

    0
    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(359)(i)(B)(2) and
    (D) to read as follows:

    Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (359) * * *
        (i) * * *
        (B) * * *
        (2) Rule 445, ``Wood Burning Devices,'' adopted on March 7, 2008.
    * * * * *
        (D) Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.
        (1) Rule 444, ``Open Outdoor Fires,'' adopted on October 8, 1976
    and revised on February 19, 2008.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. E9-13483 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

    Comments

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.
    RAWSEP Residents against wo... has turned off comments on this page.

    Trackbacks

    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None